Lorber Bacchus, Cesar concern, nothing succeeds like very a letter. For example, the budget for the national Institute of drug abuse increased by 16.2% from 2001 the 2002 alone, which would be quite a credible performance if it had been a purely commercial enterprise. $1,226,000 was added to its budget., but it would be brave or foolhardy man who asserted that a single drug addict stop, or ever will stop, take a drugs because of this extra funding. Nor would you have to be Nostradamus to predict that the budget will be keep growing, however many or few addicts. There are, unless of course there is a general economic collapse necessitating drastic budget retrenchment. One can say with a fair degree of certainty is that the funding of the NIDA will remain sturdily independent of the importance of usefulness of its findings, and of the social importance of otherwise of the problem to address. The drug situation to waste is always more to waste.
It is true, of course, that the official bureaucracy of drug addiction is a very minor partner of the drug smuggling and distribution industry, and with only a fraction of its resources, but it does have the inestimable advantage of being woolly legal and above board. When it comes to honesty, however, is a close run thing. It seems to me likely that, from the standpoint of self-awareness, the drug smugglers as is. To the repair addict counterparts. Necessity is the mother, if not of all, than at least of a great deal of intellectually honesty, and a drug smuggler can afford no illusions. By contrast, allusions are a precondition of the bureaucracy growth and continued existence.
No comments:
Post a Comment